The Non-theists utilize the “god of the gaps” fallacy in order to attack the character of a Theistic argument in support of the Theistic conclusion of intelligent design or cause. They also attempt to represent “god of the gaps” as a Theist argument, which is a misrepresentation, as only the Non-Theist ever asserts such a […]Read More
Posts in category Apologetics
Articles related to the subject of defending the Biblical Judeo-Christian Worldview against accusations made against its rational legitimacy and truth.
In my first article on the subject of the Non-Theist’s “God of the Gaps” argument and the video I did for it, there were many commenters on the video who did not understand what I was speaking about. Many of them completely missed the point I was making, and this is due to my inability […]Read More
Moral Subjectivity In the Bible? I came across the following video on my Facebook feed about a week ago from Frank Turek’s page. https://www.facebook.com/drfrankturek/videos/1163327913798730/ In this video we have the challenge being put forward that would suggest God’s morality is subjective, or Biblical Morality is subjective. It is done in the form of a hypothetical […]Read More
Now that we understand what we must do in considering the Christian response to the “God Says Kill a Child” hypothetical, let’s apply these rules and conduct some rational analysis of its implications. First thing’s first, we must put this hypothetical into proper context. We will call the individual Christian being asked the hypothetical within […]Read More
Let us first re-state the hypothetical in its simplified form: “If you were told by God to kill a child, and you knew for certain that it was God telling you, would you kill the child?” Here is the link to the video for additional clarity: https://www.facebook.com/drfrankturek/videos/1163327913798730/ So far, we have brought into consideration the […]Read More